Speed Reading


 

"So many books, so little time."
Every reader knows this expression all too well.

But what if you could increase your reading speed and discover much more books than you expected?

 

 

 

A few months ago I started to read Spead Reading for Dummies.

But it wasn't able to hold my attention throughout the entire book and thus I continued to read like I was used to.

 

 

 

Until following title came along on NetGalley: Speed Reading - Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour by Kam Knight.

The book didn't seem too thick and the ratings were pretty good.

So I figured I'd nothing to lose.

 

 

 

 

 

My choice was a bull's eye.

Here's my review:

Do you want to learn speed reading?

Then - speaking from personal experience - this book is the perfect introduction!

 

Did you know that …

 

… everyone can learn speed reading?

 

Some people assume that speed reading is hard to master and thus not within their reach.

With just a few interesting examples Kam Knight shows us that our eyes and mind process information at a high level on a daily basis and thus already have the ability to read fast.

Becoming aware of this, helped me to gain confidence in the many tips given throughout the book.

And it's true when he states that:

 

… speed reading is about making slight shifts in your reading habits?

 

The key to speed reading is adopting new habits that speed you up, while reducing habits that slow you down.

 

There's only one catch: old habits can be hard to break.

Even when a behavior isn’t working and a better way exists, habits will make it difficult to apply.

That's why this book contains practice drills, which involve repeating a routine over and over again, until the body develops a rhythm and habit for it.

 

Learning new habits is much easier.

Some of the discussed strategies are applicable without much effort and their effect is immediately noticeable.

 

… people falsely assume that slower reading means better comprehension?

 

That may be true in some cases, but in most cases, the factors causing slower reading also cause lower comprehension.

As a child we learned to read word by word.

But by making simple shifts in the way you look at words – such as looking at spaces, chunking and reducing the habit of subvocalization - you can speed up your rate significantly. And even when you're reading faster than is comfortable, you can still grasp the meaning. To see this for yourself, you can take a look at my blog article.

 

… we forget up to 80 percent of what we hear, see, or learn within a few hours of hearing, seeing, or learning it?

 

This applies to reading as well.
Kam Knight gives several interestings tips to avoid this phenomenon.

 

In fact, he gives lots of advice about several topics.

This book contains 5 sections (pre-reading, speed reading techniques, enhancing the techniques, improving comprehension and additional tips) and every section contains 3 chapters that delve deeper into specific subjects.
The presentation is very to-the-point which is why this book is pretty concise in comparison to similar books. But that's also the reason why it resonates with me: no superfluous blablabla, only interesting and hands-on information.

 

… you can enhance your current reading speed within minutes of reading some of the chapters?

 

This proved to be true in my case. And apparently lots of other reviewers had the same experience.

 

At a certain point Kam Knight says: "With commitment, there is no doubt that you will develop the ability to read a 200+ page book in one hour!"

The key words in this phrase are "with commitment".

Some people expect to be able to read at an incredible speed just by reading this book. As mentioned earlier, you'll have to break old habits and this takes time and perseverance. So don't expect to immediately read a 200+ page book in one hour.

 

But if you're prepared to practice a lot, I'm convinced that there's plenty of room for continuous improvement.

And what nicer way to do so than reading lots of books of your 'to be read'-list?

At least, that's my plan for the coming winter months ๐Ÿ˜‰

 

Following little Youtube-video illustrates how, even when reading faster, you can still grasp the meaning of the written text:

 



 

Did you know that even the BBC conducted an experiment in this area to present the news in another way?

 



 

There exist a lot of controversies about speed reading.

It's not easy to provide objective scientifical proof. More about this subject in following movie:

 



 

If you'd like to hear Kam Knight, the author of abovementioned book, you can listen to following interview.

From 10'50" he's talking about speed reading in particular.

Personally I prefer his book which is way more informative and inspiring.

 



 

Anyway, if you'll excuse me now.

With all these new techniques that I have to practice, I'm going to try to tackle my 'to be read'-mountain ๐Ÿ˜„

 

23 comments:

  1. Now, that's a book that should come in handy. But I still have so many other books to read still! What should I do now? ๐Ÿ˜…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read the one about speed reading first, so that you can read all the other books much quicker afterwards ๐Ÿ˜‹
      But whatever you decide, Nathalie, above all I wish you a lot of reading pleasure! ๐Ÿ˜‰

      Delete
  2. Tau, I can see how this technique would be useful for someone like you with an impressive shelf of books left to read. Oddly enough, this idea of processing ever larger chunks of information in less time nicely ties in with my blog post later this week, which is essentially a short and quite useless dissertation on the need for mental speed to keep up with the rest of the herd, especially as a writer. Sometimes it is truly uncanny how our minds seem to work in synchronicity. Frightening stuff, but there you have it, we're twins, no doubt about it. Probably separated at birth by mistake.

    Interestingly, I once read that managers with a full bladder tend to take better decisions as they cannot procrastinate and need to weigh in fast on a subject or they won't make it in time to the nearest rest room. The process not only seems to lead to faster but also better decisions. In conclusion, we should drink more and stay put working on our computers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now I'm even more curious about your next column, Bohse!
      You sure made me laugh with your twin comment ๐Ÿ˜„

      Why doesn't that surprise me?
      You know women: when they say that they have to go to the bathroom, often one hour later they still didn't go.
      Taking this into account, I wonder if we can deduce that women take better decisions than men? ๐Ÿ˜‹

      Delete
    2. Careful with those cheap deductions, Tau. Generally, men have bigger bladders and therefore should be regarded as the superior beings according to this theory. Simple logic.

      Delete
    3. Let's assume that you're right and that men have bigger bladders.
      You do realize what you're implying then, don't you, Bohse?
      Let me tell you:
      As men have bigger bladders, it takes much longer before their bladders are full.
      Thus they'll take less decisions with a full bladder.
      Which - in percentage terms - means that women will take more good decisions compared to men.
      Therefore women are the superior beings in this story.
      Simple logic.

      Delete
    4. Beaten by my own logic. And by a woman to boot. I hate it when that happens.

      Delete
    5. Bohse, you forgot a few words ... ;-)

      You hate it when that happens ... again and again.

      Joseph

      Delete
    6. ... again ... and again ... ;-)

      Delete
    7. @Bohse: Checkmate! Another game? ๐Ÿ˜‹

      @Joseph: And I enjoy it ... again and again ๐Ÿ˜„

      Delete
    8. @ Joseph - that's right, rub it in on me.

      Delete
    9. Men tend to go alone to the bathroom, where women usually go in flocks. So when a woman mentions she has to go to the bathroom, does she really have a full bladder or is it just an invitation to other women to go powder their nose or whatever they to there.
      I am with you, Bohse.

      Delete
    10. There's an interesting explanation for this phenomenon, Glawen:
      "A lot of the time it's as simple as trying to find an appropriate break in the conversation. When we watch TV, we all wait for commercial breaks to go to the bathroom, so we won't miss anything. In a dinner conversation, there aren't any designated "commercial breaks," but if half the group is taking off, chances are the other half will save their good stories and such until they get back."
      Source: https://www.cracked.com/blog/7-female-behaviors-that-baffle-men-explained21

      So, actually it's a compliment towards the men at the table!
      Women are so interested in hearing what they have to say, that they all take a toilet break at the same time.
      Isn't that the sweetest explanation you've ever heard? ๐Ÿ˜‹

      Delete
    11. Yeah, that is very sweet, Tau ๐Ÿ˜Š.
      So we can conclude that women don't always, or even most of the time, have a full bladder when they are going to the bathroom. And when mentioning one hour in advance merely is an invitation to other women. Following this, your conclusion about decision making must be re-evaluated again. ๐Ÿ˜

      Delete
    12. It seems that you're making false assumptions here, Glawen.
      Women dรณ have a full bladder when they go to the bathroom together.
      There's only a difference in hรณw full.
      Some women really master the art of holding in.
      And thus of making good decisions and using interesting arguments.
      If you'll excuse me now.
      I'm going to the bathroom ๐Ÿ˜‹

      Delete
    13. @Glawen: you're officially my new BFF now. Finally, someone standing up for me.

      Delete
    14. Thanks Bohse, it seems even together we can't stand up against Tau.
      @Tau, the fill level also applies to men.
      Men don't go that often, meaning their avarage fill level is higher and therefore generates better decisions.
      I'm going to hold it for the time beeing.๐Ÿ˜€

      Delete
    15. I entirely agree with you, Glawen, that the fill level also applies to men.
      But Bohse said that men have bigger bladders.
      Which means that it takes longer to fill them in comparison to those of women.
      As women don't go that often either, their average fill level is higher in comparison to that of men.
      Checkmate, Glawen! Another game? Maybe Bohse and you should call for backup ๐Ÿ˜‹

      Delete
    16. Why would you think it takes longer to fill a men's bladder? Just because it is bigger? You took the in-flow completely out of the equation. Nature tends to provide everything in proportion.
      Eventually you will checkmate me, but not just yet.
      You on the otherhand have already scored two false bingo's. ๐Ÿ˜‰

      Delete
    17. Did I took the in-flow completely out of the equation, Glawen?
      Do you mean that women don't drink as much as men?

      It's true that men have to drink more water than women (f.e.: https://hidratespark.com/blogs/hidrate-spark/who-needs-more-water-men-or-women)
      But do they actually follow that advice?
      I can't seem to find proof of it.
      Based on my personal experience: the men around me definitely drink not as much water as I do.

      Then there's alcohol.
      Assuming that men drink more alcohol than women, it's true they drink more water too (as that's also an ingredient of alcoholic beverages). But alcohol dehydrates the body. So the additional water is gone again in the blink of an eye ๐Ÿ˜‹
      Assuming men and women drink the same amount of alcohol, your reasoning could be correct. With an emphasis on 'could'. It seems to be true that alcohol has more effect on women than on men and thus the dehydration will have more effect on women. But if women drink more water alongside(which we don't know for sure, that I'll admit), then it's a status quo in my eyes. And that's nice, because that way we're both right and men and women are equal. Isn't that the perfect apotheosis? ๐Ÿ˜„

      Two false bingo's? Don't think so!
      But I do enjoy your resistance and fighting spirit ๐Ÿ˜„

      Delete
    18. Well, you thought you did checkmate us twice already. But can go with the statement that men and women are equal on this.
      @Bohse: from a loss to a draw. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Delete
  3. Hi Tau, this is a very useful post. For now I am going to focus on the space technique. I hope it will also prove useful to foreign languages. I am reading in Dutch pretty fast, but my English reading doesn't quite speed up the way I want it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad you liked it, Glawen ๐Ÿ˜‰
      That space technique is indeed very useful!
      The more you read in a certain language, the more you'll begin to think in that language. Once you begin to do that,the reading will become easier too. At least, that's my experience.

      Delete